Busting ERP Myths: The Top Five Myths About Using ERP on Your Shop Floor
Busting ERP Myths: The Top Five Myths About Using ERP on Your Shop Floor
Most producing corporations square measure different 2 solutions: Enterprise Resource coming up with (ERP) code and producing Execution System (MES) code. In some facilities, IT teams square measure mandated to take a position into ERP and to use ERP functions where doable, as well as the work, usually while not respect to practical match. this could be a risky and expensive proposition for a few producing operations. Instead, replacement ERP with a well-defined MES on the work, that is specifically designed to manage production in factories, is a more practical possibility.
The following square measure 5 common myths regarding victimisation ERP on the look floor:
Myth #1: one ERP resolution provides lower Total price of possession (TCO)
The prospect of managing a company with one all-powerful application suite is corrupting, however in several cases, it does not give the depth of practicality required to support the wants of production. To compensate, IT departments have developed in depth customizations on high of ERP systems. this tradition development is commonly finished specialised, costly ERP resources associate degreed creates an in progress maintenance want. it's common for ERP implementations to need five-to-seven times the value of services - on high of the value of the code licenses - and find yourself cost accounting way more to support and maintain than at first expected.
To reduce implementation prices, high ERP vendors square measure sanctionative easier integration and have embraced the mixing of third-party producing applications through internet services, XML integration standards and partner programs. Yet, several IT departments square measure still making an attempt to customise on high of ERP systems.
Additionally, MES vendors have endowed in off the shelf integration interfaces to ERP, leverage trade standards as well as ISA95 and OAGIS XML.
When researching solutions, confine mind that system integrators tend to stay to what has worked before and would possibly advocate custom choices, particularly since they're within the business of writing interfaces and developing custom practicality. it's vital that organizations' IT groups review MES-integration service packages so as to leverage the newest XML and standards based mostly off the shelf integration choices.
Myth #2: You recover visibility and a "single version of truth" from a centralized ERP system
ERP systems typically don't give enough practicality to show the work utterly paperless. As long as there square measure multiple paper logs and spreadsheets on the work, there's an opportunity that these completely different|completely different} knowledge sources can become different "realities" for various departments.
Many ERP vendors have noninheritable third-party modules to expand their production practicality. there's usually little distinction between the mixing of internal ERP modules and also the integration achieved with associate degree MES merchandiser resolution.
The best thanks to guarantee a "single truth" is to possess a decent integration strategy between ERP and MES that creates the work really paperless. Organizations will still support company higher cognitive process tools with consistent visibility into international operations through well integrated ERP and MES applications.
Myth #3: Standardizing on identical ERP system across the corporation will increase productivity
Many leading organizations have accomplished that their ERP system will service some plants and operations simply fine, however alternative plants with totally different producing models square measure higher serviceable with a specialised, integrated MES system. it's turning into additional common for organizations with numerous product and producing models to standardize with 2 or maybe 3 resolution sets, not only 1. the value of supporting an extra MES system is simply even in these things.
Myth #4: one ERP merchandiser can give higher in progress support
Some stakeholders in organizations would possibly believe that coping with one merchandiser or one system measuring system provides higher results and technical support. But, the truth is that organizations serviceable by smaller MES vendors that focus on specific industries receive higher service and faster response.
Myth #5: The practicality in ERP is sweet enough for the discrete-production work
According to AMR Research's 2006 survey, the subsequent problems arose among corporations victimisation and evaluating ERP for his or her plants:
• ERP encompasses a complicated computer program for the producing workers
• ERP does not address all of our needs and cannot model our complicated producing processes
• ERP takes too long and prices an excessive amount of to customise and implement for producing
• ERP configuration needs specialised and costly ERP code skills
• ERP screens need costly configuration for prompting and validatory knowledge assortment
These survey results on ERP systems square measure still valid these days. to substantiate these impressions, organizations ought to analysis the number of screens and commands needed within the ERP system to perform a number of common production transactions, sort of a work order split. Then, compare the efforts needed to perform identical functions in associate degree MES designed for a selected trade. Also, it might be useful to check the days needed for a mechanic on the work to perform examination knowledge assortment and signatures in each systems. These easy knowledge points can provides a fast plan of the variations in simple use and ready-to-wear choices in every application.
When researching that computer code would work best for your work, examine associate degree ERP system's match. the most effective resolution is also associate degree integrated ERP-MES system.
